Paper 105: Deity and Reality/ / Melchizedek

Paper 104          Paper 106

For Biblical cross-references for all Sections: click here.

Introduction

Section 1: The Philosophic Concept of the I AM

p8Urantia etymology by Chris Halvorson: “specific: Urantia = (y)our heavenly place (i.e., in the cosmos)” “-tia = noun-forming suffix < -t- of L. past participle stem + -ia (cf., -tion and -ion)” “U.B.: “-tia” is indicative of impersonal, while “-ia” is more personal”

cross-references:

Section 2: The I AM as Triune and as Sevenfold

p7Havona etymology by Chris Halvorson: “the “new heaven” (Rev:21.1).” “-a = L. noun suffix (first declension, nominative) = U.B., general noun suffix, used to indicate the additional specific meanings of the coined name”

p11Tigran Aivazian’s videos with graphic representation of formulas for Ultimaton at Rest and Ultimaton Deindividuation at High Frequency Oscillations.

cross-references:

p7The other usage of Father-Son-Spirit is used at 13:2.4. Father-Father is only used at 8:1.2. Father-Spirit is used twice: (16:3.10), (104:4.23). Father-Son is used twenty-nine times. The other two usages of Mother-Son are: (105:3.4), (158:3.2). father-mother appears once at 33:5.1. Mother-Spirit and MotherMother are never used.

Section 3: The Seven Absolutes of Infinity

p8: Original printing reads, “Unifier of the deified and the undeified; corelater of the absolute.” SRT version reads, “Unifier of the deified and the undeified; correlator of the absolute.” Explanation, “Although it is remotely possible that the original, corelater, (which is not found in either Webster’s or the OED) was a coined extension of corelation and corelative (both of which are found), it is not readily apparent how corelater would differ in meaning from correlator, the now standard form, which is found five times elsewhere in the text. The more likely situation is that two separate typographical errors were made when this word was set. The first was a dropped keystroke at the end of a line of type (co– instead of cor-); the second was an incorrect keystroke, substituting e for o. This doubly misspelled word would still be difficult to catch in proofing because it would sound the same when read aloud by the copyholder, and interestingly enough, if it looked odd to a proofreader and consequently led him or her to consult the dictionary, the spelling could neither be confirmed nor denied by either Webster’s or the OED as neither dictionary contained correlator or corelater. Without an electronically searchable text, it is unlikely that the evidence of the otherwise unanimous usage within the revelation itself could have been brought to bear on the problem.”

cross-references:

The other two usages of Mother-Son: 8:1.2 and 158:3.2

Section 4: Unity, Duality, and Triunity

cross-references:

Section 5: Promulgation of Finite Reality

cross-references:

Section 6: Repercussions of Finite Reality

cross-references:

Section 7: Eventuation of Transcendentals

p9space potency: (42:2.6) “On Uversa, space potency is spoken of as ABSOLUTA.” See Nigel Nunn’s “Exploding Dark Islands” presentation, which covers the relationship between absoluta, segregata, ultimata and  in the creation of ultimatons and how all of this relates to dark islands and black holes.

p19Melchizedek etymology by Chris Halvorson: “Heb., the king (malki) of righteousness (tsedheq) = U.B., the primary righteous expression (of a local universe descending Son)”

Nebadon etymology by Chris Halvorson: “the first (a) nebular (neb-) upland (don) (The local universe level is the local upland relative to the lowlands where mortals begin their ascension careers in the Milky Way spiral nebula.).” “don < O.E., dun = n., down = upland”

cross-references:

p9space potency appears in eighteen paragraphs: (4:1.9), (11:2.9), (11:5.4), (11:7.4), (11:8.5,8), (15:4.2), (42:2.3,5,6,7,10,16), (42:10.1), (56:9.7), (104:4.22), (105:7.9), (115:2.3).

Paper 104          Paper 106

CONTACT

Thanks for getting in touch!

Sending

©2017 by Halbert Katzen

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?