Paper 63 Paper 65
See Etymology of Coined Terminology.
Introduction
Section 1: The Andonic Aborigines
p0: aborigines/aboriginal are used thirteen times, including the one time it is preceded by “so-called” in reference to the secondary Sangik mixture found in southern Indian at 79:2.2. The other references, involving the original Andonic stock are at: (61:6.3), (61:7.4), (63:4.3), (63:5.4), (64:1.0), (64:7.18), (76:2.4), (78: 1.5), (79:2.2), (81:4.4,9), (85:1.5).
p1: Tibet. See: UBtheNEWS: Tibet Rising research page.
metric conversion “. . . arid Tibetan land elevations, 9 km above sea level . . .”
p6: See cross-reference study: So-Called Scinece +.
p8: procreate See cross-reference study: Cocreat- Procreat- Partnership with God.
See the UBtheNEWS Eyes, Skin, and Hair Color research page.
Section 2: The Foxhall Peoples
The use of the term “Foxhall peoples” is an apparent reference to the archaeological work of Nina Frances Layard. The 2005 publication of Miss Layard excavates: the Palaeolithic site at Foxhall Road, Ipswich, 1903-1905 was written by researchers involved with the AHOB (Ancient Habitation of Britain) project. In their resurrection of the importance of this archaeological site, White and Plunkett describe how aspiring archaeologist Nina Frances Layard discovered Lower Palaeolithic hand axes and the remains of extinct mammals in a working quarry close to her home in southeastern England; arranged permission, financing, and workers to conduct an excavation; and published her findings. The site is little known today, they say, not because of any failing in the excavation work, but because the lack of supporting professional and official support in the early 20th century allowed the artifacts to be scattered and the site to be developed later.
Curiously, The Urantia Book chose to name a population of early man after this early, underappreciated archaeological work, which, over one hundred years later, is gaining respect for its contribution to this subject area.
In 2014, 800,000 year old human footprints were found near Happisburgh, England. See LiveScience article. This adds additional support to the UBtheNEWS: Early Migration to Britain Report.
The Scientific Symposium I in 1988 published Scott Forsythe’s “The Foxhall Peoples: An Encounter between Archaeology and The Urantia Book” His early work on this subject presents some intriguing backstory, not covered in the UBtheNEWS Early Migration to Britain Report. Click here for this highly recommended article.
p3: See cross-reference study: So-Called Scinece +.
Section 3: The Badonan Tribes
p5: Neanderthal race From the Abstract of a study published on Science Advances in May 2019: “Drawing on quantitative analyses of dental evolutionary rates and Bayesian analyses of hominin phylogenetic relationships, I show that any divergence time between Neanderthals and modern humans younger than 800 ka ago would have entailed unexpectedly rapid dental evolution in early Neanderthals from Sima de los Huesos. These results support a pre–800 ka last common ancestor for Neanderthals and modern humans unless hitherto unexplained mechanisms sped up dental evolution in early Neanderthals.” See 65:6.5 on the evolution of teeth.
Section 4: The Neanderthal Races
The UNESCO World Heritage archaeological site at Zhoukoudian, China is an especially abundant source of early humanoid artifacts–Peking Man. Accurately dating human fossils from the site has been difficult. In 2008 new and more exacting dating techniques were applied to the sediment layers where the bones were found. The results indicate that the fossils are around 200,000 years older than previous estimations of approximately 550,000 years. The new dating places these fossils in a significantly colder environment due to ice age activity that occurred 750,000 years ago.
Additionally, a recent re-evaluation of hand axes found at the site reveal a higher degree of sophistication in tool making than previously thought. This discovery indicates that these early humans were more skilled at hunting and slaughtering animals than anthropologists originally hypothesized. See UBtheNEWS Early Migration to China Report.
p2: Kary Mullis is famous as a Nobel Prize-winning biochemist for his improvement of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique and somewhat infamous for his highly unpopular and outspoken views on subjects outside of his field of expertise. On his website, he recommends books, including “The Urantia Book ostensibly by Extraterrestrials.” His Urantia Book-link goes to a page on his website that lists a few articles from Nature and Science to support a few statements in The Urantia Book that were not supported by science in 1955. Wikipedia page: Mullis.
p7: saber-toothed See: Saber-Toothed Cats research page.
Section 5: Origin of the Colored Races
The UBtheNEWS Research on the Double Dual Origin of Modern Man and pre-Modern Man page is a collection of scientific articles related to the Andon-Sangik pre-Modern Man genetic mutations and the Nodite-Adamite Modern Man genetic introductions. This Research page can be appreciated more readily if one first becomes familiar with the Topical Study: Genetic Introductions, Mutations, and Evolution: a Urantia Book perspective, the Adam and Eve Report, and the Gobekli Tepe Report.
p3: sunlight See Topical Study: Health and Healing.
Section 6: The Six Sangik Races of Urantia
See Sangiks and Adjutant Mind Spirits, by Chris Halvorson. Highly recommended. This provides a perspective on how the Sangik races may each tend to be especially influenced by one of the first six adjutant mind spirits.
p3-9: The Clovis First theory, which holds that Native Americans arrived over the Bering Straight land-bridge about 12,500 years ago, was predominantly held by scholars at the time of publication. Since 1955, new discoveries have been increasingly pushing this date further back in time. Much of the “old guard” opinion on this subject is still unwilling to concede a date prior to about 25,000 years ago. Nonetheless, numerous sites in both North and South America provide strong evidence for the presence of the Native Americans 40,000 to 60,000 years ago. Part of the problem with accepting the credible archeological evidence in conflict with Clovis First is that it also conflicts with the widely held “out of Africa” theory. This topic is an excellent example of just how difficult it is for scholars who have invested their reputations in “old theories” to consider new evidence without bias. See UBtheNEWS Early Migration to the Americas Report.
p5,24: red man, Europe See UBtheNEWS: Race Mixes and Migrations research page. See also UBtheNEWS: Migration to the Americas research page.
p19: metric conversion: “. . . many of their leaders being 2.4 and 2.7 m in height.”
p24: See cross-reference study: So-Called Scinece +.
Section 7: Dispersion of the Colored Races
Two partial archaic human skulls, from the Lingjing site, Xuchang, central China, provide a new window into the biology and populations patterns of the immediate predecessors of modern humans in eastern Eurasia. See 3/2/17 Science Daily article.
p2: antipathy: This word appears once. See Mohammed Ali offer his thoughts and feelings on mixed marriages.
p6,16: brown is used four times in connection with race: 78:3.8 , 94:5.6.
p14,15: Egypt A research paper titled “Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes suggest an increase of Sub-Saharan African ancestry in post-Roman periods” was published by Nature Communications in 2017. From the abstract: “The samples recovered from Middle Egypt span around 1,300 years of ancient Egyptian history from the New Kingdom to the Roman Period. Our analyses reveal that ancient Egyptians shared more ancestry with Near Easterners than present-day Egyptians, who received additional sub-Saharan admixture in more recent times. This analysis establishes ancient Egyptian mummies as a genetic source to study ancient human history and offers the perspective of deciphering Egypt’s past at a genome-wide level.”
p15: National Center for Biotechnology Information report: Excerpt from the conclusion of a study on archaeological evidence from 70 thousand years ago in South Africa: “The data presented here thus urges caution in relying on climatic or environmental factors as theoretical drivers of cultural change. The palaeoenvironmental proxies from KDS and BBC, as well as wider bathymetric modelling for the region, indicate that there was significant variation in the terrestrial and marine resources available to humans at these sites during the periods of occupation. However, while these changes may have impacted human subsistence strategies, they did not directly influence technological or cultural innovation. Indeed, the entirety of early human material cultural florescence associated with the Still Bay and Howiesons Poort traditions in the southern Cape, or southern Africa more widely, cannot be uniformly linked to climatic and environmental forcing.”
p18: aborigines/aboriginal are used thirteen times, including the one time it is preceded by “so-called” in reference to the secondary Sangik mixture found in southern Indian at 79:2.2. The other references, involving the original Andonic stock are at: (61:6.3), (61:7.4), (63:4.3), (63:5.4), (64:1.0), (64:7.18), (76:2.4), (78: 1.5), (79:2.2), (81:4.4,9), (85:1.5).
Additional notes:
Matthew Block suggests that the following authors were influential in writing of this Paper and has prepared a parallel chart:
Henry Fairfield Osborn, Man Rises to Parnassus: Critical Epochs in the Prehistory of Man (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1927) Wikipedia page.
Henry Fairfield Osborn, Men of the Old Stone Age: Their Environment, Life and Art (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1915, Second Edition) Hathi Trust Digital Library copy.